PDA

View Full Version : Guy fined 1.5m for uploading pirate copy of Mario


itsmyyard
11-02-10, 13:18
http://www.news.com.au/technology/james-burt-fined-16m-for-uploading-pirate-copy-of-super-mario-bros-wii/story-e6frfro0-1225828405307

IT'S game over for one over-zealous player who was fined $1.5m for illegally copying and uploading a pre-release version of a popular game.

James Burt, 24 from Brisbane, received an early copy of Nintendo's Super Mario Bros Wii and made it available for download from a website, which has since been shut down.

As a result of his actions the Federal Court ordered Burt to pay Nintendo $1.5m in damages and also cover the $100,000 in court costs.

The Super Mario Bros games are among the most popular ever produced by Nintendo with millions of copies sold around the world.

Super Mario Bros Wii, which was due for official release on November 12, 2009, was copied and offered by Burt online from November 6.

The title in question was the first time the popular game was available for the popular Nintendo Wii console with up to four players able to join the action at the same time.
Once Nintendo was aware of the breach the company employed a forensic investigator which eventually tracked down and revealed Burt as the offender.

The game had already been downloaded "many thousands of times" according the Nintendo's legal representatives Maddocks Lawyers in Melbourne.

On November 23 Nintendo obtained a Federal Court search order for Burt's residence in the Brisbane suburb of Sinnamon Park and obtained evidence which was used in the case.

Nintendo Australia managing director Rose Lappin says the case a victory against piracy.

"Piracy is massive and getting bigger and bigger but I think the courts are taking it more seriously now as you can see by this," she said.

"As an industry it's a major problem and the cost is massive to the industry and to developers.

"Some of these guys say there are more downloads and patches than there are actual sales for them.

"That's shocking for our industry."

Soop
11-02-10, 13:32
Blimey -1.5m!
Still, just goes to show, crime doesn't pay.

fresh
11-02-10, 13:35
Insert coin to continue.

I guess he's out of coins for a while.

draconacticus
11-02-10, 13:37
Still, just goes to show, crime doesn't pay.

It does. Half upfront, half when the job's done. :p

Aren't fines in court normally done in proportion to the individual's wealth? He either must have been loaded or they're planning to harvest his organs.

Score 1 for intellectual property rights though :). I wish it worked the other way around too. There are lots of artists online who are having their work plagarised by the likes of men's magazine's and major high street stationers. Intellectual property laws should do more to protect the rights of the little guy too without having to go through expensive court battles.

Soop
11-02-10, 13:41
It does. Half upfront, half when the job's done. :p

Aren't fines in court normally done in proportion to the individual's wealth? He either must have been loaded or they're planning to harvest his organs.

Score 1 for intellectual property rights though :). I wish it worked the other way around too. There are lots of artists online who are having their work plagarised by the likes of men's magazine's and major high street stationers. Intellectual property laws should do more to protect the rights of the little guy too without having to go through expensive court battles.

Sometimes, they'er deliberately huge to serve as a warning. It will probably be dropped to less later, but that won't be widely reported.

At the moment I bet there are a few people unplugging their servers in a panic!

And I agree with your last paragraph.

draconacticus
11-02-10, 13:50
And I agree with your last paragraph.

Yup, laws should give everyone an equal opportunity to defend their creativity. As it stands some large corporations feel they have impunity to do as they please because some struggling artist can't afford to bring them to court.

Often happens in cases of patent infringement too. Large companies just draw out the case until the poor inventor runs out of cash to fight the case.

Bobafet
11-02-10, 13:58
Insert coin to continue.

I guess he's out of coins for a while.
:D:D:D:D

thezombiemessia
11-02-10, 14:21
Simply put, if he can't afford to pay it back...then he should have thought about what he was doing.

A crime is a crime, and a punishment is a punishment.

EDIT:

http://kotaku.com/5468379/somethings-not-quite-right-about-nintendos-aussie-pirate