View Full Version : Resident evil in GTA 4 style ?! :) good idea
Now just try to imagine what would happen if they make a resident evil wich would have sooo much freedom as the gta4 game ? :),
Gta4 style big maps and freedom and graphics combined with lost planet 3rd person camera style and aiming.
or gta4 style combined with re5 camera style, so evry time you go out from a car or something the camera is going right up on the shoulders like in re4 and 5.
I think this idea would be a legendary one, it would be a legendary game, (just look at gta4, i know it since the begining that gta 4 will be the game of the year, i was sure in that)
So a nice resident evil storyline, style, facilitys , maps etc, but with such a big freedom as in gta4.
so this would be something great. and even if the title would not be resident evil 6 but it would have another title, but the idea is still grate in my opinion.
I think Resident Evil works as well as it does because it is Linear, a straight forward path from start to finish.
Given the freedom of GTA4, what would you do to advance the game? How would the story conclude? Or would you just keep wandering around forever, like Oblivion.
Games like Resident Evil require objectives, something to aim for, something to end the story with.
Its an interesting idea, but I dont think they would go together.
You criticise RE4 for being an action game in your other thread, and then you post this whopper of an idea to have RE in the GTA action. Riiiight.
The biggest problem with this idea is that if you take away the empowerment from the designers to make the game in a way where you are only meant to see what they want you to see, the game is hard to make scary. Horror relies heavily semiotics and camera angles. So if it was made as a GTA type of game, it would probably lack a lot of mood in the levels.
thezombiemessia
27-04-08, 18:43
You criticise RE4 for being an action game in your other thread, and then you post this whopper of an idea to have RE in the GTA action. Riiiight.
QFT
I would prefer DR2 to be like this though...though a little more restricted, with an ending, etc.
Triple Seven
27-04-08, 18:51
The camera angles play a minor role now, with a controllable camera. Chances are the standard games arent going to be scary anyway, if RE4 is any indication.
aka Active
27-04-08, 19:22
Driving cars in resident evil ?b)
seth ranson
28-04-08, 20:45
That would be an interesting idea for another Outbreak, but not for the main series.
Since there are no famous characters in Outbreak they only have to survive, and the Umbrella story isn t really that necessary.
It would require a LOT of zmobies (EDIT: I meant zombies here of course, but you could guess that I think...), though.
Streets had to be so crowded (with zombies and humans) that you can t drive through them...
I think it would really be worth a try like this.
Maybe there could be several ways to win too:
-simply survive and hope that somebody will come and save you (which would probably ending up in having yourself nuked...)
-escape the city (maybe even something bigger like a whole state???okay that s too big)
-kill all zombies (which I personally would not like to do)
That would satisfy both those who want an original RE (with the drawback of having less story though) and those who prefer RRE (RamboRE)
RELAX MATES. who said to make gta4 re style as the main title ? lol read please mates. i said NOT as a main title
I say it again, gta4 big city , freedom yes but quests aswell, wich you have to do and go through!, and when you go out of a vechile or car you see the character like in lost planet as 3rd person and realistic movements, aiming and stuff, so why wouldnt be scary ? if there are on the streets insane zombies and other type of infected animals and creatures ?, i said just an idea but of course if you try to imagine it you imagine it as a full game made perfectly as resident evil.
Yes drive cars in resident evil why not ? we are in 2008 not in 1996, drivin car is a realistic. its something real or arent ? people like to drive cars (atlast most of them), it would be much more complexed with cars, helicopters and stuff wich you can control by your self.
Of course if the game offers freedom that means you are free to think, so it puts you in the realistic life, so you can feel for real that you are inside the game, cause in reality if that would happen to you how would you act ? where would you go ? how would you escape ?, of course there have to be riddels wich helps you and give you ideas about going folowing the right patch, this is a very complicated idea to make resident evil in gta4 style but that dozent mean it have to be exactly as gta4, it means just to be the same style but with resident evil action , riddels and story and enemis and stuff.
I am tierd to creat a whole idea about how this style should be maked by capcom cause it is a realy hard job, it is not something i can do or atlast something i am going to do cause im not a capcom member and im not payed for that.
It is just a nice idea wich i have , and maybe who knows ? it would work very cool as an next outbrake title or another title.
thezombiemessia
29-04-08, 16:51
Even as a side game it would go completely against your standards of what a RE title should be...going by previous comments in other threads at least.
I mean...you are essentially saying that if you want it to play like a traditional RE game...you essentially have to sit inside your little base and just wait for someone to come and rescue you/kill you.
Whilst if you want the storyline or to actually play the game, you have to play it as an all action title. Cars, bikes, helicopters...so you can drive over the enemies, shoot them from the air, or drop bombs on them?
That just goes into the insanely actiony elements.
As a RE title, side game or not, it would just fail...
it would totally destroy Resident Evil, sorry for saying.
Not as a main title, why ?.
The action elements from gta4 are superb, not like in re4 tipical shooter/action game,
look at gta4 ....i said evryone since 3 years that this gta4 will get number 10 on gamespot. and its true.....
It is the first game since the last 10 years since (zelda ocarina of time) this is the first game wich gets nr:10 editor`s choise.
So it gave me an idea about what if ?....but ofc not as a main title...this is just like a book, you read it and you have an imgatination about it, i didnt say that the next resident evil should be exactly same as this gta4 lol just the freedom from the game and the idea of driving and stuff, graphics and more freedom gives a next generation feeling that we realy play in 2008.
Well this topic is anyway to see how many like the idea and how many dont.
Not main title i repeat.
You criticise RE4 for being an action game in your other thread, and then you post this whopper of an idea to have RE in the GTA action. Riiiight.
QFT
I would prefer DR2 to be like this though...though a little more restricted, with an ending, etc.
QFT again I agree 100%
Not all of us have rich imagination.
Neither do capcom so the result is like it was with >re4 and dead rising.
Maybe my ideas are to high level for normal peoples or maybe my ideas are to retarded....who knows
All you need to do is step down from your high horse and view the world with the rest of us little people.
wesker_resurrected
30-04-08, 19:23
no
just no
although a free roaming survival game could be good though maybe in an I am legend style with scavenging i the day and survival at night
Not all of us have rich imagination.
Neither do capcom so the result is like it was with >re4 and dead rising.
Maybe my ideas are to high level for normal peoples or maybe my ideas are to retarded....who knows
Neither does Capcom? Erm, I really do insist on that theres a reason for why they work in Capcom and youre writing in a forum. They have much more experience, academic knowledge and understanding for their market, than all of this forum combined. Theyre not stupid, otherwise they wouldnt be hired in the first place. It is a matter of business, aesthetic choices and art, in which you clearly fail to see.
seth ranson
01-05-08, 00:06
@Clayonite: Maybe Furious meant that Capcom can t imagine that a game concept like this would work? You need rich imagination for that.
I mean...you are essentially saying that if you want it to play like a traditional RE game...you essentially have to sit inside your little base and just wait for someone to come and rescue you/kill you.
Whilst if you want the storyline or to actually play the game, you have to play it as an all action title. Cars, bikes, helicopters...so you can drive over the enemies, shoot them from the air, or drop bombs on them?
That s a little over the top, I d say.
Waiting isn t that easy in Outbreak, right (if you don t put yourself into a locker that is)? What I meant by waiting was to try to simply stay alive until for example you are saved or can save yourself (or die).
You shouldn t be able to freely drive through the city either, there have to be a lot of zombies, I said that didn t I? More like the beginning of the second RE movie.
What I would be interested in would be trying to get out of a zombie-crowded city without having only one set path in front of you.
At the beginning you plan a route through the city. For those who want to shot their way free (no, not with helicopters, that wouldn t make sense, since you could simply leave the city; a helicopter would be a possible escape-vehicle though) the path had to include some weapon shops, the others would plan a route with less zombies. Everytime you play through the game you could find new secrets that are hidden in the city.
While playing you then loose your map, and have to remember everything, and plan another route if yours is blocked (since the map didn t show wrecked streets and houses).
Nothing too weird like driving by car all the time, having a helicopter (and the ability to fly it) for some reason or getting enough weapons for starting a third World War.
It would really be interesting having no preset path you have to walk on, like in RE4.
The old REs were alerady a little closer to this, but instead of giving the player more freedom Capcom took it away with RE4 (there s no doubt that it is extremely linear, right?)
Maybe you need rich imagination for thinking that a game like this would work (and sell), but I think it s perfectly possible.
I even got a slogan for the commercials:
Free RE!
or for TV: a zombie saying: Let my people go, that they may hold a feast unto me in the wilderness. (for those who have no idea why this should be funny: read the bible!, that is, no don t do that, but googling that sentence would be an option)
Sorry, if all of this seemed a little ironic. To make sure there s no confusion: the part from the qoute until Maybe you need... was meant seriously.
Clayonite so you mean that even if capcom make a bad game in our opinion that is cause they want it so , because they sell more copyes from the commercial action shooter games then from the original oldschool games ?
Yes it is maybe so . but dont forget that this dozent mean im a retard or we all are to stupid or that our imagination is way lower then theyr just cause they was on academy schools and they are profesinals.
Because even if you are a profesional in what you do that is a big difference from creating an graphic engine or story/gameplay.
Because they might be profesionals for making nice graphics and some commercial way a nice gameplay for an action/shooter game but that dozent mean that all of us here on the same place dont have even 20% imagination for a storyline and gameplay style compared to them.
You just insulted me by seing that . how do you know how much i know ? or how inteligent i am ?, how can you know what would happen if i would work at capcom and i could tell all my ideas on my own language to them and make a nice colaboration together that the incoming game wouldnt be way much beter or even revolutionary compared to the old ones or recent ones ?.
My english is crap but that dozent mean im stupid or something, i just learned english in the last 2 years just from 1 single game called world of warcaft. before i started that game i didnt even know more then 4 words ...i didnt learned english in the school , neither did i read a book or something. but anyway.
I find this forums for the reason to talk about many things, about ideas and much more, if we think something or we want to say something about a game an opinion then we say it here, if our opinion is bad or good we say it here, no need to underastimate us mate.
When i personaly think about how i would make a next resident evil then i take the ideas from the movies, games , even other games not just resident evil ones and i try to make a combination of all in one , i mean it sounds complicated i know but if you understand what i mean , i mean that if i combine 50 action/horror movies, and over 30 games i played + my creative imagination and make 1 game then that maybe would be a revolutionary one.
I have an example, look at Metal Gear, for me Hideo Kojima is a man with high imagination, all the metal gear games got a high long complicated storyline , and a very adictiv funy enjoyable gameplay. this is just an example.
anyway i dont think that evrything we talk here will be taken in consideration from any of the capcom members, so in one way or other we just waste our time here by talking stuff wich never gona happen in the upcoming games.
By the way it is a bit starting geting on my nervs that some people start to give me warnings and judge me and keep telling me that i have to get banned and stuff like that.. well if you think that im an idiot and my attitude sucks, and that there is no need for people like me on this forum then i realy dont mind if you ban me. i came here since the first day to coment my ideas about the game , about capcom, about how it would be to change the storyline and gameplay from the way it is now...i didnt come here with bad intentions..so if i get a ban or anything like that i dont judge my self for that, as i said before maybe im to smart or maybe im to retarded i cant decide that.
Thank you for reading and sorry for my bad english.
thezombiemessia
03-05-08, 11:05
Dude, we dont care about your English...it is good enough to alway get your point across. Your English isnt the problem here, it is your attitude.
You come on here telling us what to think, and that if we think differently from you we are wrong and obviously arent fans of the series. But as soon as we try to tell you differently you get all defensive and start to preach at us.
The reason why you are getting a ban is not because of your opinions, but because of the way you treat both this forum and the members. You are rude to us, you are rude to Capcom, you refuse to listen to other peoples opinions....
Clayonite so you mean that even if capcom make a bad game in our opinion that is cause they want it so , because they sell more copyes from the commercial action shooter games then from the original oldschool games ?
Yes it is maybe so . but dont forget that this dozent mean im a retard or we all are to stupid or that our imagination is way lower then theyr just cause they was on academy schools and they are profesinals.
Youre right, it doesnt mean that youre imagination is worse than theirs...but it does mean that there is a much larger team all working together to create a storyline and a game, to work everything out so it fits in with the rest of the series, to do character development, location design, enemy design.
And yes, because they are all professionals it does tend to mean that they would probably come up with something better than what any of us can create.
Because even if you are a profesional in what you do that is a big difference from creating an graphic engine or story/gameplay.
Well, yeah...if you were talking about a professional brick-layer, then obviously they couldnt design a graphics engine, or a storyline or any other such things for a game. However, a professional games designer, games programmer, scripter, whatever...then yes, they WOULD be able to do this...because they are professionals.
Dude im not rude to people here, dont take it so personlay and so serious...
Ive read that in GTA IV online you can jump into a car whith 3 other team mates and drive trou the city.
In terms of GTA resident evil style i can imagine Jumping into a armoured vehicle whith 3 other team mates whith a Big Gun in the trunk Driving into racoon city and go on a zombie hunt wipe out a square or something that would be fun i think .
Clayonite so you mean that even if capcom make a bad game in our opinion that is cause they want it so , because they sell more copyes from the commercial action shooter games then from the original oldschool games ?
Yes it is maybe so . but dont forget that this dozent mean im a retard or we all are to stupid or that our imagination is way lower then theyr just cause they was on academy schools and they are profesinals.
Because even if you are a profesional in what you do that is a big difference from creating an graphic engine or story/gameplay.
Because they might be profesionals for making nice graphics and some commercial way a nice gameplay for an action/shooter game but that dozent mean that all of us here on the same place dont have even 20% imagination for a storyline and gameplay style compared to them.
You just insulted me by seing that . how do you know how much i know ? or how inteligent i am ?, how can you know what would happen if i would work at capcom and i could tell all my ideas on my own language to them and make a nice colaboration together that the incoming game wouldnt be way much beter or even revolutionary compared to the old ones or recent ones ?.
My english is crap but that dozent mean im stupid or something, i just learned english in the last 2 years just from 1 single game called world of warcaft. before i started that game i didnt even know more then 4 words ...i didnt learned english in the school , neither did i read a book or something. but anyway.
I find this forums for the reason to talk about many things, about ideas and much more, if we think something or we want to say something about a game an opinion then we say it here, if our opinion is bad or good we say it here, no need to underastimate us mate.
When i personaly think about how i would make a next resident evil then i take the ideas from the movies, games , even other games not just resident evil ones and i try to make a combination of all in one , i mean it sounds complicated i know but if you understand what i mean , i mean that if i combine 50 action/horror movies, and over 30 games i played + my creative imagination and make 1 game then that maybe would be a revolutionary one.
I have an example, look at Metal Gear, for me Hideo Kojima is a man with high imagination, all the metal gear games got a high long complicated storyline , and a very adictiv funy enjoyable gameplay. this is just an example.
anyway i dont think that evrything we talk here will be taken in consideration from any of the capcom members, so in one way or other we just waste our time here by talking stuff wich never gona happen in the upcoming games.
By the way it is a bit starting geting on my nervs that some people start to give me warnings and judge me and keep telling me that i have to get banned and stuff like that.. well if you think that im an idiot and my attitude sucks, and that there is no need for people like me on this forum then i realy dont mind if you ban me. i came here since the first day to coment my ideas about the game , about capcom, about how it would be to change the storyline and gameplay from the way it is now...i didnt come here with bad intentions..so if i get a ban or anything like that i dont judge my self for that, as i said before maybe im to smart or maybe im to retarded i cant decide that.
Thank you for reading and sorry for my bad english.
TZM kindly covered some of the things I would say, but yeah. First of all, I never said youre stupid. Secondly, what I mean is that everyone have ideas. Theyre everywhere and theyre not very hard to come up with. HOWEVER, this is important: this is what separates amateurs from professionals; professionals are able to successfully deliver any idea to match their target audience. No matter how bizarre or obscure it might be.
For example, if someone came up to Nintendo today and told them to make a game where you play as a chubby small Italian plumber with a big moustache, eating mushrooms and jumping on turtles, Nintendo wouldnt dismiss the idea right away for the simple reason that, at the end of the day, anything goes. It all comes down to how the idea is delivered.
So in other words: ideas are only so much, talent as a Designer in the video games industry is defined by, first of all, being able to explain to others your vision. And in many cases, you also have to convince the publishers that in a way theyre confident they will gain on it, so all they want to see is something political correct and something with a wide demographic. -That and additional in-house publisher policies very often cuts down on your options. Then, finally, you have to make sure a team on 40 people are on the same page as you with it and dont mess up. And you have to have a very good understanding for how things are made, so you know whats possible to achieve within your budget [that being money, time, polycount, texture space and general disc space].
Bottomline is that there is much more to being a Game Designer than you think, and the reason why they are hand picked for being a Designer is not for their ideas, but primarily for delivering ideas.
Also, just really quick, you make it sound like the Designer does all the work, which is entirely wrong. Funny you should mention Kojima Productions, where theres actually a big dedicated team responsible for the ideas behind the series, and not just Kojima. I know for a fact that they keep a big record in the studio where all the emplyoees can submit their ideas for the game, and then they are later discussed in the board. For example, the feature of Solid Snake standing up against a wall and looking around the corner was an idea by a coder. In Square Enix, cutting to CG videos when the summons appear where originally an idea by an artist [Nomura]. Making a game is team work, and everyone gets their say.
seth ranson
06-05-08, 00:17
I ve been completely ignored in this mess... did you guys at least read my post?
(@Spike 74: THAT is moaning (at least if I got the meaning of that word correctly))
Well walking in a autobus or car in a burning city full of creatures zombies and nemesis , with riddles and stuff would be still something new and enjoiable,
You think that the freedom would make dificulty problems that way that people who plays the game wouldnt know wich way to go and what to do and maybe they would go in wrong places..well even if a city is big and you have a gta freedom in it that dozent mean you finish the map without making the storyline and do what you have to do, the riddles and storyline intro movie would show us the main idea about what we have to do to get the dor xz open and to move out of the city to another new map, and the city so would be full of riddles and closed buildings and stuff like that so i personaly still belive in the idea that the game would have a big succes if they would work very hard on it and perfectionate it in a original resident evil way.
seth ranson
09-05-08, 18:34
You think that the freedom would make dificulty problems that way that people who plays the game wouldnt know wich way to go and what to do and maybe they would go in wrong places..
That would be a positive aspect in my opinion. Running in a dead end while there are some zombies on your toes would be stupid though. There always has to be some way out, then it would be exciting, because you have to quickly find that exit then.
Not knowing what to do adds to the feeling of being completely lost and alone (if there are no weird Metal Gear Solid radio messages).
this big freedom idea in resident evil would be something ultra next generation reality simulation but in the same time it is almoust an incredible imposible hard work to make a game like that, so even if they would make the game it wouldnt be soo succesful as it should be cause it would cost over 6 years of hard work and milions of dollars.
Member_of_STARS
11-05-08, 20:22
GTA4 type sucks big hairy balls, mainly because of graphical downgrade.
STALKER type RPFPS-esque game would work better.
What separates the two is the fact that you dont have one great world to explore, the world is divided into sections. In stalkers case, you progress in area and sections while you progress in the story. The bigger upside is the fact that you get pretty graphics, engaging gameplay and you can still employ Resident Evil 3.5 gameplay, which is the only factor that would keep the game from becoming a non-survival horror game.
Freedom and exploration is GREAT only if it fits the game and the setting. Often, it comes with major compromises. Unfortunately, RE is a survival horror game. Build the game around it.
seth ranson
11-05-08, 20:34
In my opinion GTA4 has quite good graphics.
I don t like it for a different reason: It s gangsta-style.
I don t think that would make RE a non-survival horror game. The mansion in RE1 had some freedom to run around already, after all.
At least I want more freedom than in RE4, because this game really was keeping you on one set track all the time. That even takes away survival horror style.
come to think of it I maybe it would work for Outbreak 3 online, but not for the main story line games.
Member_of_Stars try to imagine how big gta4 is and then talk about graphics.
And if you want to see gta4 with very good next gen graphics then buy a samsung monitor wich can rule 1080p resolution.
or buy an 1080p resolution tv and stay at last 2 meters away from it to see the graphics.
Gta4 is a perfect game. i love gangsta style and this game is the only game in the world wich can make you feel how it is to live a free life in america where you start evrything from 0 and at the end The world is yours its a game like the movie scarface from al pacino its just much more storyline and much more gameplaytime .
but im sure that many people still cant imagine the resident evil in gta style in the way i imagine it, i just cant explain exactly how i imagine it, and as i said if they would make the game as i imagine it it would be or imposible or posible but it would take over 6 years of hard work and extremley much money.
Member_of_Stars try to imagine how big gta4 is and then talk about graphics.
And if you want to see gta4 with very good next gen graphics then buy a samsung monitor wich can rule 1080p resolution.
or buy an 1080p resolution tv and stay at last 2 meters away from it to see the graphics.
Gta4 is a perfect game. i love gangsta style and this game is the only game in the world wich can make you feel how it is to live a free life in america where you start evrything from 0 and at the end The world is yours its a game like the movie scarface from al pacino its just much more storyline and much more gameplaytime .
but im sure that many people still cant imagine the resident evil in gta style in the way i imagine it, i just cant explain exactly how i imagine it, and as i said if they would make the game as i imagine it it would be or imposible or posible but it would take over 6 years of hard work and extremley much money.
GTA native resolution is 720p on 360 and PS3 Yes they are upscaled to 1080p
GTA 4 dose have good graphics but nothing groundbreaking.
Both PS3 & 360 have games with a lot better graphics.
I thing GTA has always been about style of game which is pure violence sandbox type gameplay over graphics.
2 meters away ouch you will go blind lol
seth ranson
11-05-08, 23:45
come to think of it I maybe it would work for Outbreak 3 online, but not for the main story line games.
That s what I suggested too.
If it was online it would even be superior to GTA for those who like GTA right now, because there s a good multiplayer mode.
GTA doesn t have a real good one as far as I know.
Member_of_STARS
12-05-08, 11:02
In my opinion GTA4 has quite good graphics.
I don t like it for a different reason: It s gangsta-style.
It has adequate graphics, and the compromise is obvious. The smaller the space you roam around, the less the gear has to render, the better graphics you can cram in. It has quite good graphics, if you want low-res sombies and boxy hunters. Consider the fact that youd have to throw in a sh!tload of BOWs to make the huge areas as crampy and claustrophobic to make the gave have any resemblence to horror.
http://www.gtafour.us/images/screenshots/gta4tv.jpg
I don t think that would make RE a non-survival horror game.
It would, without a doubt. Its all about how the parts of the whole fit, its all about the synergy. Ever wondered why games like Dead Rising were absolutely crap at horror? GTARE would play out exactly the same. Unless you make the game immersive and throw in a sh!tload of psychological barriers. And it all starts with graphics and level design.
The mansion in RE1 had some freedom to run around already, after all.
Thank you for proving my point. Think about it for a second.
Member_of_Stars try to imagine how big gta4 is and then talk about graphics.
Try actually reading first. Why do you think Ive been talking about compromise and the inability to create same emotions and impressions using wide and operable space with downgraded graphics.
And if you want to see gta4 with very good next gen graphics then buy a samsung monitor wich can rule 1080p resolution.
or buy an 1080p resolution tv and stay at last 2 meters away from it to see the graphics.
You obviously have no clue what good graphics look like. Typical fanboy.
Here, Ill make it simple for you.
http://www.gtafour.us/images/screenshots/gta4tv.jpg
http://i18.tinypic.com/82adz4n.jpg
Gta4 is a perfect game.
No its not.
i love gangsta style and this game is the only game in the world wich can make you feel how it is to live a free life in america where you start evrything from 0 and at the end The world is yours its a game like the movie scarface from al pacino its just much more storyline and much more gameplaytime .
A- This explains why I feel like arguing with someone with a Down syndrome
B- American dream through criminal activity is not exclusively American, nor does the game represent the real life America (hell, you dont even speak proper English, so youre either a kid impressed with cRAP music or someone whos seen too many bad movies by Curtis Jackson). Scarface is a classic, GTA4 is pimpin hoes yo yo modern culture-lacking braindead entertainment. Fun, engaging, great, yes. But nothing serious, dramatic.
but im sure that many people still cant imagine the resident evil in gta style in the way i imagine it
I do, which is why Im saying its a terrible idea. Every established game franchise works within its own rules. REGTA will not work out as a survival horror game, unless you change everything RE about it. Then it wont be a RE game anymore.
i just cant explain exactly how i imagine it, and as i said if they would make the game as i imagine it it would be or imposible or posible but it would take over 6 years of hard work and extremley much money.
You think youe discovered the subject? Ive been in RE forums since 2002, this subject is OLD. And the conclusion has always ended up with this- it wont work without sacrificing everything RE about it.
seth ranson
12-05-08, 16:56
RE does need some more freedom than in the fourth one though. Don t you think so?
Member_of_STARS
12-05-08, 17:03
Freedom =/= Good
Freedom needs to fit game, enhance it. Most games that tout the word freedom around, fail at utilizing it.
seth ranson
12-05-08, 17:07
?
I d prefer having to choose where to go next and not being lead on a path like in RE4.
In RE4 it doesn t happen often that you can take an alternative route to get somewhere.
Mostly it is quite clear where you have to go.
can we not stretch the damn forum please.
They are zombies in GTA 4, so furious gets the game he wants, and everyone else gets Resi 5.
A win win situation :lol:
seth ranson
12-05-08, 19:45
Honestly?
This is ridicolous.
RE in GTA4 stile would be a horrible idea, and if they WOULD actually do it. RE would be called another GTA rip-off, kinda like this (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/True_Crime:_Streets_of_LA) game and its Comparisons to Grand Theft Auto blablabla
Honestly?
This is ridicolous.
agree with that. Im gonna get some icecream
The answer is NO!
I like GTA as a mindless run around game.
And I did just order GTA4.
But I dont want them to breed and have some kind of mutant baby!